Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43856 (PAT)

Vidyanath Jha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/10904/2015 · 2025-07-10

Alok Kumar Sinha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10904 of 2015 ====================================================== Satish Kumar Jha S/o Late Vidyanath Jha, R/o Village - Khatuaha, P.S. Khanpur, Distt. -Samastipur, at present R/o 2116/A6 Gali No. - 7, Prem Nagar S.O. Central Delhi, Delhi - 110008. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Samastipur. 4. The Circle Officer, Khanpur Block, Samastipur. 5. The Ram Sagar Jha, Son of Ramdev Jha, Resident of village- Khatuaha, Via- Ilmasnagar, P.S.- Khanpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.A.Ujjwal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 7 10-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for respondent No.5 are present. 2. On previous occasion, i.e., on 19.06.2025 also nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioner to contest the writ petition. Vide order dated 19.06.2025, it was made clear that if on the next date, nobody will appear, this Court may consider dismissing the writ application for non-prosecution. 3. Today also nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to contest the writ application. This is an old case of the year 2015 and therefore, needed to be perused with diligence. Patna High Court CWJC No.10904 of 2015(7) dt.10-07-2025 2/2 It is, therefore, clear that the petitioner has lost interest in the present case. 4. Under these circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. sanjeev/- (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U