FAREED AHMED HAJAM v. GULZAR AHMED QURESHI AND ORS.
CPSW/342/2010 · 2025-07-22
Javed Iqbal Wani
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4385 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4385 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 342/2010 in SWP No. 1146/2010
Fareed Ahmed Hajam
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. P. N. Bhat, Advocate.
vs
Gulzar Ahmed Qureshi and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 22.07.2025
1. According to the counsel for the petitioner, the instant contempt petition has arisen out of the interim order passed in SWP No. 1146/2010, which petition, however, during the pendency of the instant contempt petition, came to be dismissed, rendering the instant contempt petition inconsequential.
2. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, the contempt notice issued to the respondents/contemnors is recalled and the contempt proceedings are closed.
3.
Disposed of.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
Jammu 22.07.2025 Sahil Padha
Whether the order is speaking; Yes/No.
Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No. Serial No. 12 Sahil Padha 2025.07.22 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document