IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL T\A/0 THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ‘' PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA ^ WRIT PETITION NO: 10435 OF 2025^ Macharla Venkata Reddy, S/o. Mugi Reddy Aged 37 years, Occ: Cultivation, Prakasam District. AMARAV Between: R/o. Kothapalli Village, Yerragondapallem Mandal ...Petitioner AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Markapur Revision Division, Prakasam District. 4. The Tahsildar, Yerragondapallem Mandal Prakasam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction may more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4'^ respondent in making efforts to delete the name of the petitioner from the online revenue records, in respect of his agricultural landed properties to an extent ofAc. 0.40 cents covered by Sy Nd. 144-4 and an extent of Ac 2 00 cents covered by Sy No. 144-11 of Yerragondapallem Revenue Mandal of Prakasam district. village and issuing notice and further contemplating to create third party interest in' respect of subject lands without as illegal, irrational, irregular, arbitrary against to the principal of natural i 300A of Constitution of India not to create any third party interest i petitioner. IA_N0i10F 2025 Without following procedure of law and justice and violative of Articles 14, 21 and respondent in.respect of the said lands of the and consequently direct the 4 Petition under Section stated In the affidavit filed I pleased to direct the 4 respect of the petitioners 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court respondent not to create may be any third party interest in agricultural landed propertfes to an extent of Ac. 144-4^,an extent of Ac. 2.00 cents of Yerragondapallem Revenue village and 0.40 cents covered by Sy No. covered by Sy No. 144-11 Mandal of Prakasam District; Counsel for the PetitionerSRI. SHAIK JAHANGEER BASRA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: APHC010208252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] ►- H WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10435/2025 Between: Macharla Venkata Reddy, ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SHAIK JAHANGEER BASHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): I 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: r 'V 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10435/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of fPQ 4^^ respondent in making efforts to delete the name of the petitioner from the online revenue records in respect of his agricultural landed properties to an extent of Ac. 0.40 cents covered by Sy.No.144-4 and an extent of Ac.2.00 cents covered by Sy.No.144-11 of Yerragondapallem Revenue village and Mandal of Prakasam District without issuing notice and further contemplating to create third party interest in respect of subject lands as illegal, irrational, irregular, arbitrary, without following procedure of law and against to the principal of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4^^ respondent not to create any third party interest in respect of the said lands of the petitioner and pass such other order. ’’ 2. During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, without touching the merits of the case, requested this Court to issue a direction to the respondents not to create any third party interest in respect of the subject property, without following due process of law. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property, the respondents would follow due process of law. 3 4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition directing the respondents not to create any third party interest in respect of the subject property, without following due process of law. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. SOI- V.DIWAKAR deputy registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER , To, 1. The Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, State of Andhra Pradesh (BY SPECIALMESSENGER) 2. The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Markapur Revision Division, Prakasam District. 4. The Tahsildar, Yerragondapallem Mandal Prakasam District. (Addressee Nos.2 to 4 BY RPAD) 5. One CC to SRI. SHAIK JAHANGEER BASHA Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:23/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10435 of 2025 C>.i 2 5 SEP 2025 mi COSTS^^'^^ PETITIION WITHOUT