Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43844 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA SINGH @ RAJU S/O SHRI POORAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10290/2025 · 2025-09-04

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35679] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10290/2025 Rajendra Singh @ Raju S/o Shri Pooran Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Borwad, Police Station Sendra, District Beawar (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail Beawar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Mr. Shyam Bihari Guatam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/09/2025 1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the petitioner-accused Rajendra Singh @ Raju S/o Shri Pooran Singh, in FIR No.254/2025 dated 25.07.2025 registered at P.S. Jawaja District - Beawar, whereby the petitioner-accused has charged under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 333 and 305(a) of BNS, 2023. 2. The petitioner was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the petitioner is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a report is registered against unnamed and unidentified persons. During [2025:RJ-JP:35679] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10290/2025] investigation, police has identified and arrested Rajendra, Virendra Singh, Rahul Singh but trial Court has granted bail to accused Virendra Singh and Rahul Singh and rejected bail of the present petitioner on the ground that a recovery is effected from present petitioner. He submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner accused and he is entitled for bail on basis of parity. He submits that the injures are simple in nature and petitioner is a young unemployed man. He also submitted that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On basis of report lodged by complainant Maina Devi about robbery in the night of 24.07.2025 by 3-4 unknown persons with concealed identity, the matter is investigated. During investigation, the present petitioner accused was arrested on 01.08.2025. A recovery is effected at the instance of present petitioner. Learned Sessions Judge has granted bail to similar placed persons Virendra Singh and Rahul Singh. There is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner accused. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the petitioner-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, [2025:RJ-JP:35679] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10290/2025] looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner-accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of petitioner- accused is hereby allowed and the petitioner-accused Rajendra Singh @ Raju S/o Shri Pooran Singh is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The petitioner-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The petitioner-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the petitioner-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/143