IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH.rAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10164 OF 2Q2fi o Co \ Ti: X V o, ★ o. Between: ^•^^•^shminarayana, S/o B.Varadhi, Aged about 50 years R/o 2/479 Peddanimagudi, Bukkarayasamudram Village and M^dal', Anantepu^ ^ Swamy, S/o S.Pothulaiah, Aged about 45 years R/n oyayeedhi, Bukkarayasamudram Village and Mandal, Anantapur Dist 3. J.Chinnababbaiah, S/o Late Babaiah Branmana Street, Bukkarayasamudram Dist. Aged about 46 years, R/o village and Mandal, Anantapur P Kondanna, Aged about 40 temple, Bukkarayasamudram Village and Mandal years, R/o 2/858, SLNS I Anantapur Dist. 5. S.Ramakrishna, S/o Late S.Sreeramulu, Aged about 49 years R/o 7/47 Rekulakunta, Bukkarayasamudram Village and Mandak Lantapur Ditt 6. R. Mallesu, S/o R.Ramappa, Aged about 57 vear<; R/n 9 Bodiganidoddi, Rotarypuram Village and Mandal, AnLtapur Dist. / ...Petitioners AND 2. The District Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3. The Superintendent Engineer(R and B), Anantapur 4. The Assistant Executive Engineer (R District. ' Executive Engineer (R District. ' Amaravati, Guntur Anantapur District, and B), Anantapur, Anantapur and B), Anantapur, Anantapur 6. The Tahsildar, Bullarayasamudram Mandal, Anantapur Dist f ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or any other proceedings one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the respondents 3 to 6 in not taking legal action against 7th respondent who illegally occupied the site and constructed shops in roads and buildings(R and B) land in Sy.No.436 of Bukkarayasamudram village and Mandal, Anantapur Dist. illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently respondents to take action against the 7th respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2Q2fi as direct the Petition under Section 15i CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the CIt IIidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be to take action against 7*'' respondent who illegally occupied the site and constructed shops in roads and buildings(R&B) land in Sy.Nd.436 of Bukkarayasamudram village and mandal, Anantapur Dist., pending disposal of the Writ Petition pleased to direct the respondents 3 to 6 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M KARIBASAIAH Counsel for the Respondents No.1, 3 to 5: GP FOR ROADS AND BUILDINGS Counsel for the Respondents Nb.2, 6: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: Order APHC010196572025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) " •/ [3331] WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10164/2025 Between: B.lakshminarayana, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.M KARIBASAIAH ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS j 2.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: Heard Ms. Aishwarya, learned counsel representing Sri M. Karibasaiah, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Ch. Praveen, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings, for respondents 1, 3 to 5 and Sri Bhagat Singh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondents 2 and 6. 2. Notice in respect of respondent No.7 is dispensed with, since no adverse order affecting his right or interest is passed. 3. The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in not taking legal action against respondent No.7, vis-a-vis, the construction W.P.No.10164 of2t \ of shops made by respondent No.7 in the land belonging to the Roads and Buildings Department, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners confined the arguments and urged to direct the respondent authorities to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 22.11.2024 and pass appropriate orders. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings submitted that respondent No.3 will consider the petitioners’ representation and pass appropriate orders. 4. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of^ with the consent of learned counsel on either side, directing respondent No.3 to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 22.11.2024 (Ex.PI) and pass appropriate orders. If necessary by issuing notice to respondent No.7. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SECTtON OFFICER 1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Roads and Buildings Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3. The Superintendent Engineer(R and B), Anantapur, Anantapur District. 4. The Assistant Executive Engineer(R and B), Anantapur, Anantapur District. 5. The Deputy Executive Engineer(R and B), Anantapur, Anantapur District. 6. The Tahsildar, Bullarayasamudram Mandal, Anantapur Dist. 7. One CC to SRI M KARIBASAIAH Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR ROADS AND BUILDINGS, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 9. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Three CD Copies 6. //TRUE COPY// 0 \L To, 10. gsg HIGH COURT DATED; 30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10164 of 2025 S?AN0Sgf^ X 25 SEP 2025 | %^ . Current Section * DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS