Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43839 (RAJ)

ADIL KHAN S/O YAKUB ALI v. MUNICIPAL BOARD DEOLI

CW/18871/2025 · 2025-12-04

Anuroop Singhi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49250] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18871/2025 Adil Khan S/o Yakub Ali, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Janta Colony, Goushala Ke Piche, Ward No. 14, Deoli, Tonk (Raj.) Mobile 9602153254 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Municipal Board Deoli, District Tonk, Through Its Executive Officer. 2. The Chairman, Municipal Board Deoli, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 04/12/2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, contending that, as a citizen of India, he possesses all the rights to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court to challenge the Agenda dated 27.11.2025, moved by the Municipal Board, Deoli. The challenge is specifically directed against Agenda No. 3 thereof, vide which a proposal has been moved for permitting social organizations to utilize the public parks on a rental basis for holding their functions. 2. Upon a specific query being raised by this Court regarding the locus standi of the petitioner to approach this court, the solitary response was that as a resident of Deoli, the petitioner has a right to approach this Court against any illegal action being taken by the Municipal Board, Deoli. This Court is not convinced regarding the locus of the petitioner, thus in the considered opinion of this Court, as the petitioner has no locus to approach [2025:RJ-JP:49250] (2 of 2) [CW-18871/2025] this court, there is no occasion for invoking extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to invoke all other appropriate legal remedies as available to him under the law. 3. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. 4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to take back the coloured photographs submitted along with the petition. 6. The said prayer appears reasonable and is accordingly allowed, with a direction to the petitioner to substitute the said photographs with xerox copies thereof. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J Sunita/2