[3329 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADD;^: WRIT PETITION NO: 10053 OF 2025 Between: Mohamed Nazeer Basha, S/o.Shaik Mahaboob Basha, aged about 68 years,R/o.D.No.19-171 District. Red cross street Chittoor Town, Chittoor ...Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi Guntur District. The District Collector, Tirupati, Tirupati District. The Revenue Divisional officer, Tirupati, Tirupati District. The Tahsildar, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Ramachandrapuram, Tirupati District. 1. 2. 3. 4. ...Respondents - Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying-mat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the Meeseva application No. TTA012400117558 Dated: 27-01- 2024 submitted by the petitioner for the deletion of the land to an extent of Ac.4.62cts in Sy.No.258/2A7 of Nadavaluru village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal from the list of Prohibited Property under Section 22A(1)(a) of Registration Act, 1908 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principle of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to consider the Meeseva application no.TTAOl 2400117558 Dated.27-01-2024 submitted by the petitioner for the deletion of the land to an extent of Ac.4.62 Sy.No.258/2A7 of Nadavaluru village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal from the list of Prohibited Property under Section 22A(1)(a) of Registration Act, 1908. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the Meeseva application No. TTA012400117558 Dated: 27- 01-2024 submitted by the petitioner for the deletion of the land to an extent of Ac.4.62 cts in Sy.No.258/2A7 of Nadavaluru village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal from the list of Prohibited Property under Section 22A(1)(a) of Registration Act, 1908; Counsel for the PetitionenSRI. P GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: APHC010194742025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY .THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10053/2025 Between: Mohamed Nazeer Basha ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PGANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 NV,J W.P. NO.10053 OF 2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO:10053/2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief; "... to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the Meeseva application No.TTA012400117558 Dated 27 01 2024 submitted by the petitioner for the deletion of the land to an extent of Ac.4-62cts in Sy.No.258/2A7 of Nadavaluru village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal from the list of Prohibited Property under Section 22A(1)(a) of Registration Act, 1908 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principle of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to consider the Meeseva application no.TTAOl 2400117558 Dated 27 01 2024 submitted by the petitioner for the deletion of the land to an extent of Ac.4-62 Sy.No.258/2A7 of Nadavaluru village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal from the list of Prohibited Property under Section 22A(1)(a) of Registration Act 1908 and pass..." Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government 2. Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. "Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the consider and dispose of the Mee-Seva application 3. respondents to No.TTAOl 2400117558, dated 27.01.2024 submitted by the petitioner. 3 W.P.N0.10053 OF2025 4. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue the Mee-Seva application No.TTA012400117558 With the authorities, within readily agreed to dispose of dated 27.01.2024 pending a reasonable time. 5. In view of the submission Revenue appearing for the or otherwise of the allegations that no such direction be i “The Government of India that such orders of the learned Government respondents, this Court need Pleader for not decide the truth made in the petition. This Court iIS conscious Apex Court in wherein the Apex Court held a quick or easy disposal of issued, in view of the judgment of the V. P.Venkatesh^ may make for overburdened adjudicatory institutions, justice. As the learned direction to dispose of dated 27.01.2024, this Court direction. cases in But, they do not counsel for the petitioner himself serve to the cause of requested to issue a NO.TTA012400117558, except to issue such the Mee-Seva application find no other alternative 6. In the result, the writ to consider petition is disposed of, directing the respondent and dispose No.2 of the Mee-Seva application providing opportunity of No.TTAOI 2400117558, dated 27.01.2024 hearing to the petitioner and (04) months from the date of after other stake holders, if any, within a period of four receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 2004 (1) see 769 4 NV,J W.P. NO.10053 OF 2025 Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. Sd/-G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Amaravathi Guntur District, State of Andhra Pradesh (BY SPECIALMESSENGER) 2. The District Collector, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 3. The Revenue Divisional officer, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 4. The Tahsildar, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Ramachandrapuram, Tirupati District. (Addressee Nos.2 to 4 BY RPAD) 5. One CC to SRI. P GANGA RAMI REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 6. TwoCCsto GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] ■" 7. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT DATE0:22/04/2025 ORDER ^ ro SEP 2025 S. ^ . Current Section . f/ WP.No.10053of 2025 X- DISPOSSING THE WRIT PETITIION