Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010032202009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 46/2009 IN/AND I.A.No.03 of 2010 (X-OBJ.No.43491 of 2010) Between:
1. ALLENA SRINIVAS KUMAR, S/O.MANMADHA RAO, HINDU EMPLOYEE, ESM GRADE-I, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY O/O.ANAPARTHY R.S., EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND
1. SMT ALLENA MADHAVI, W/o.Allena Srinivas Kumar, Hindu Housewife C/o.Sri M.Appa Rao, B-39, VUDA Colony, Near Rythu Bazar,
...RESPONDENT IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 4841 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2010(FCAMP 751 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 165 days in filng the present cross objections against decree and order dated 25.09.2008 in OP.No. 54/2005 on the file of the court of the LEarned Judge, Family court, Visakhapatnam in the interest of justice IA NO: 3 OF 2010(XOBJ 43491 OF 2010
2
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:
1. S RAJAN Counsel for the Respondent:
1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.46 of 2009 IN/AND
I.A.No.03 of 2010 (X-OBJ.No.43491 of 2010) COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the appellant has produced a letter, dated 10.10.2025 sent by the appellant, wherein it is averred that the appellant and the respondent are living together and he intends to withdraw this appeal. 2. The said letter is placed on record. 3. Basing on the said letter, learned counsel for the appellant sought permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 6.
In view of dismissal of the Family Court Appeal and as both the parties are living together as per the Letter, dated 10.10.2025, nothing survives in the X-Objection Petition (I.A.No.03 of 2010) for adjudication. 4
7. Accordingly, I.A.No.03 of 2010 (X-Obj.No.43491 of 2010) is dismissed as infructuous. 8. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
__________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA Dated: 15.10.2025 TM
5
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.46 of 2009
Dt.15.10.2025 tm