[2025:RJ-JP:44471] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11716/2025 Sonu S/o Samundar Singh, R/o Village Gothra, Police Station Kirawali, District Agra (U.p.), At Presently R/o Village Ganeshra, Near Temple, Tehsil And District Mathura (Uttar Pradesh). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Singhal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Anirudh Singh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 06/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 354/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 61(2)(a), 318(4), 318(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that present dispute is civil in nature qua the monetary transaction of Rs. 5.50 Lac. It is submitted that criminal flavour has been given to the same. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that present dispute is civil in nature; that accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and [2025:RJ-JP:44471] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11716/2025] looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kotwali District Bharatpur in F.I.R. No. 354/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Sonu S/o Samundar Singh, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /282