‘ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM TO mi Ctt CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1422 OF 2024 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated. 15/03/2024 passed in LA.No.l42 of 2024 in O.S. No. 715 of 2015 on the file of the Learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole. Between: 1. Jagatapu Venkata Krishna Rao, (Died) 2. Jagatapu Venkata Narasamma, W/o. Venkata Krishna Rao 3. Jagatapu Ramesh, S/o. Venkata Krishna Rao, 4. Somasi Padmavathi, W/o. Srinivasa Rao, All are residents of Sri Rama Colony, Kumool Road, Ongole, Prakasam District ...REVISION PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS AND Jajam Usha Rani, W/o. Venkateswarlu, Hindu, House wife, aged about 42 years, R/o Revenue Colony, Kumool Road, Ongole, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S. No. 715 of 2015 on the fife’^ of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole. C^ynsel for the Petitioners: SRI. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETI The Court made the following ORDER: i V . •‘'•4 APHC010258642024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMJ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1422/2024 [3459] Between: Jagatapu Venkata Krishna Rao(diecl) and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Jajam Usha Rani ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner{S): 1 .VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent: 1.PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETl 2 The Court made the following Order: The present Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 15.03.2024 passed by learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole, in I.A.No.142 of 2024 in O.S.No.715 of 2015. 2. As can be seen from the report furnished by the District Judiciary, the main suit in O.S.No.715 of 2015 itself was dismissed as not pressed on 06.09.2024. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K.J. RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / h/h' SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To 1. The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole. 2. One CC to SRI. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI. PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETI, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies Chp CHP, ’ HIGH COURT DATED:23/04/2025 ORDER CRP.No.1422 of 2024 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS