[2025:RJ-JP:50463] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14467/2025 Pradhan Son Of Kaluram, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Kharbason Ki Dhani, Nimeda, Police Station Bhankrota, District Jaipur, At Present Patwari, Patwar Halka Kaithuda, Sub Tehsil Khatoli, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 15/12/2025 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.275/2025 registered at Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, ACB District for offence punishable under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (amended 2018). 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that false recovery of bribe amount of Rs.45,000/- has been shown from the possession of the petitioner. It is contended that that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 15.10.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:50463] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14467/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for bail made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties as also considering the period of custody and the fact that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Pradhan Son Of Kaluram, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /26