"V IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) e WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL In TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ' ^ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11183 OF 2025 Between: R. Rama Chandra Reddy, S/o. R. Kannaiah Reddy, Aged 80 years Occ: Aged Person, R/o!'D:Nb. 14-1-73, Nehru Nagar, Tirupati City, Tirupati District. Erstwhile Cliittodr District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pfadesh, RejDr by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Departrhent, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Policei Tirupati, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupati, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. 4. The Station House Officer, Edst Police Station, Tirupati, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. 5. I. Venkata Subbamma, W/o. Madhava Reddy, Aged 45 years, Occ; House wife, R/o. D.No. 141, t.P. area, Tirupati Town, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Tirupati District “ ' ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, ofber Of direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of Respondents 2 to 4 on petitioner's representation dated 21.03.2025, for granting police aid in preventing illegal construction being e 5 Respondent in contravention to interim injunction, dated |2 J0.2024 granted in lA. No. 248 of 2024 in lA. No. 264 of 2018 in OS. #.254 of 2011 -.#v on the file of Hon'ble IV-Additional District Judge Court, Tirupati, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non-discharge of legal obligation conferred on the part of Respondents 2 to 4 and it offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents more particuiarly Respondent No's 2 to 4 to grant him poiice aid in preventing the S'" Respondent in proceeding with iiiegai construction in violative of said interim injunction. lA NO: 1 OF 7()9R Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i pleased to direct the Respondents 2 praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may be to 4 to grant him police-aid in preventing illegal construction being made by the S'" Respondent in contravention to interim injunction, dated 22.10.2024 granted in lA. No. 248 on the file of Hon'ble by considering petitioner's of 2024 in lA. No. 264 of 2018 in OS. No. 254 of 2011 IV- Additional District Judge Court, Tirupati representation dated. 21.03.2025- Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: APHC010224192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) S;*0 [3457] B WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11183/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER R Rama Chandra Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner aggrieved by the illegal construction of the respondent in contravention of the injunction order granted in I.A.No.248 of 2024 in LA.No.264 of 2018 in O.S.No.254 of 2011 on the file of IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati. In this regard, the petitioner sought for police protection for preventing the illegal construction made by the 5‘^ respondent. I 2. IS 2 3- The learned Assistant Government police cannot be expected to and the petitioner would have appropriate relief. Pleader submits that the against an illegal construction competent authority seeking provide protection to approach the 4. Considering the submissions, the stage of admission, the Writ Petition is disposed of, at petitioner to the alleged illegal leaving it open for the approach competent municipal authority construction of the S*'" with a complaint of respondent, if so advised. No As a sequel thereto, the costs. 5. miscellaneous petitions^f any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //True copy// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, State of Andhra Pradesh (BY SPECIALMESSENGER) 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupati, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. 4. The Station House Officer, East Police Station, Tirupati, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. 5. I. Venkata Subbamma'/VWdMVIadhava Reddy, Aged 45 years, Occ; House wife, R/o. D.No. 141, T.P. area, Tirupati Town, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Tirupati District (Addressee Nos.2 to 5 BY RPAD) 6. One CC to M/s. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME',High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 8. Three CD Copies • HIGH COURT \ \ DATED: 30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.11183 of 2025 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION