LALSAB S/O GOUSUSAB NADAF v. SANGAMESH S/O UMESH HALLIKERI
MFA/24034/2013 · 2025-04-08
Umesh M Adiga
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43815 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43815 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6206 MFA No. 24034 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 24034 OF 2013 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
LALSAB S/O. GOUSUSAB NADAF, AGE 40 YEARS, OCC: LABOURER (GHADI REPAIR WORKS), R/O. ALTAF PLOTS, OLD HUBLI, HUBLI, DIST. DHARWAD. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA A. PUROHIT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SANGAMESH S/O. UMESH HALLIKERI, AGE MAJOR, OCC : OWNER OF AUTO RICKSHAW, R/O. C/O. G. V. GHODAKE, SADASHIV NAGAR, NEAR BANTIKATTA, OLD HUBLI, HUBLI, DIST: DHARWAD.
2.
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD, ENKEY COMPLEX, KESHWAPUR, HUBLI, DIST: DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJASHEKHAR S. ARANI, ADV. FOR R2;
NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 24.07.2013 PASSED BY 1 ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND MACT DHARWAD, SITTING AT HUBLI IN MVC NO.716/2009 AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench.
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6206 MFA No. 24034 of 2013
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA)
1. Learned advocate for the appellant filed memo of withdrawal with the following reasons:
“1. The captioned appeal is filed being aggrieved by the judgment and award passed by he 1st Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge and MACT, Dharwad, sitting at Hubbali in MVC No.716/2009.
2. It is submitted that, the party is not available in communication for further instructions in the said appeal. Based on the information of referring advocate, the party is nowhere. Hence the appeal may kindly be permitted to withdraw in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. Appeal is dismissed without any liberty to file afresh. Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE
KGK /CT-AN / List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3