APHC010066962019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3095/2019 Between: 1. M CHAKRAM, S/O. LATE GOVINDU, 55 YEARS, R/O. TIRUMALI VILLAGE, YELESWARAM MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. MUWA VENKATESULU, S/O. LATE GOVINDU, 54 YEARS, R/O. TIRUMALI VILLAGE, YELESWARAM MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. MUVVA NOOKARAJU, S/O. LATE GOVINDU, 51 YEARS, R/O. TIRUMALI VILLAGE, YELESWARAM MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRI SECRETARY (HOME), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YELESWARAM POLICE STATION, YELESWARAM, E.G. DISTRICT. 3. MR MUVVA VISHNU, S/O. GOVINDUAYYA ALIAS GOVINDU, 49 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 4-21, THOTA VEEDHI, YELSWARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. MR D PRAVEEN, S/O. JOHAN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. BADRAVARAM VILLAGE, YELESWARAM VILLAGE, YELESWARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not taking any action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 05.02.2019 and not even registering an FIR or causing any enquiries in terms of the Judgment of the Honourable Apex Court in the case of Lalitha Kumar' Vs. State of U.1), as being illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to take action on the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 03.02.2019 and to register FIR, IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to take action on the complaint submitted by the petitioner on 05.02.2019 forthwith by registering an FIR, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M CHALAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M CHALAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.3095 OF 2019 ORDER: Sri M.Chalapathi, learned counsel for the writ petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 24.12.2025 Pmk 4 14 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:3095 OF 2019 Date: 24.12.2025 Pmk