Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43803 (AP)

YERNENI ADINARAYANA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/13431/2023 · 2025-07-06

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010242502023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ncMN-- MONDAY.THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13431 OF 2023 Between: 1. Yemeni Adinarayana, S/o Late Appanna, aged about 70 Niddam Village, G. Sigadam Mandal, Srikakulam District. 2. Yemeni Prakasa Rao., S/o Late Appanna, aged about 65 years, R/o Niddam Village, G. Sigadam Mandal, Srikakulam District. years, R/o ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary to the Govt, of Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, AP, Department of Revenue, Amaravati. 2. The Commissioner, Land Administration, Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada 3. The Commissioner, Survey, Settlement and Land Records office, Sai Residency, 7th Lane, 0pp. Narayana School, Nagarjuna Nagar, currency Nagar, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh 520008 4. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District. 5. Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam District. 6. The Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam District, 7. Reddy Venkatayya S/o Adinarayana, aged not known, R/o Ward No.3, Door No.3-35, Palakollu Village and Mandal, East Godavari District 8. Kadilindi Sudara Rama Raju, S/o Krishnam Raju, S/O Sundara Rama Raju, aged not known, Muvvalavari Palem, Visakhapatnam-17. Sri ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to it is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble court in the interest of justice may be pleased to issue a Writ, order, or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 4 to 6 in not sending the report on the proceedings Ref. CCLAs Ref. No.83/432/2011, dt.24-03-2011, and also not taking any action on the representation, dt.22-07- 2022 submitted by the petitioners to the 1st Respondent and 2nd Respondents and the endorsement D.Dis.No. 1012/2011/E1, dt.27-02-2016 issued by the 4th Respondent is arbitrary, illegal, colourable exercise of power and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India to quash the endorsement No.D.Dis.No.1012/2011/El, dt.27-02-2016 issued by the 4th Respondent and issue a consequential direction to the Respondents to consider the representation, dt.22-07-2022 for grant of NOC for the land in Sy.No.296/4 to an extent of Ac.5.00 cents situated at Madhurawada Village, Visakhapatnam and to pass such other and further orders as the Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. and Prayer is amended as per the C.O. dt.08.05.2024 vide orders passed in lA No.01of2024. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay of all proceeding including any construction in Sy.No.296/4 to an extent of Ac.5.00 situated at Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam. lA NO: 2 OF 2023 ^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioners, dt.22-07-2022 for grant of NOC for the land in Sy.No.296/4 to and extent of Ac.5.00 cents situated at Madhurawada Village, Visakhapatnam and Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI A RAJENDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 to 6: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: APHC010242502023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13431/2023 // PCltl ■. // [3329] / B Between: 1.YERNENI ADINARAYANA, S/0 LATE APPANNA, AGED ABOUT SRI^kSlAM D?STRICT^^ 2.YEMENI PRAKASA RAO,, S/0 LATE APPANNA, AGED ABOUT SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT^^ MANDAL, ...PETITIONER{S) AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY GOVT. OF AP, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2.THE COMMISSIONER, LAND ADMINISTRATION PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA 3.THE COMMISSIONER, SURVEY, SETTLEMENT RECORDS OFFICE, NARAYANA SCHOOL, TO THE SECRETARIAT ANDHRA AND LAND SRI,SAI RESIDENCY, 7TH LANE, OPP. nagarjuna nagar, currency NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520008 collector, visakhapatnam district 5. REVENUE DIVISIONAL DISTRICT. 6.THE TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. S/O ADINARAYANA, AGED NOT KNOWN, R/0 WARD NO 3 DOOR NO.3-35, PALAKOLLU VILLAGE AND GODAVARI DISTRICT ^ KRISHNAM RAJU, S/0 SUNDARA RAMA RAJU, AGED NOT KNOWN, MUVVALAVARI PALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM- 17. OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM MANDAL, EAST ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tolt is therefore prayed that this Honble court in the interest of justice may be pleased to issue a Writ, order, or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 4 to 6 in not sending the report on the proceedings Ref. CCLAs Ref. CCLAs Ref. No.83/432/2011, dt.24-03-2011, and also not taking any action on the representation, dt.22-07-2022 submitted by the petitioners to the 1st Respondent and 2nd Respondents and the endorsement D.Dis.No.1012/2011/E1, dt.27-02-2016 issued by the 4th Respondent is arbitrary, illegal, colourable exercise of power and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and quash the endorsement No.D.Dis.No.1012/2011/El, dt.27-02-2016 issued by the 4th Respondent and issue a consequential direction to the Respondents to consider the representation, dt.22-07-2022 for grant of NOC for the land in Sy.No.296/4 to an extent of Ac.5.00 cents situated at Madhurawada Village, Visakhapatnam and to pass such other and further orders as the Honble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Prayer is amended as per the C.O. dt.08.05.2024 vide orders passed in lA No.01 of 2024. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 to Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Stay of all proceeding including any construction in Sy.No.296/4 to an extent of Ac.5.00 situated at Madhurawada Visakhapatnam and to pass lA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents No.1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioners, dt.22-07-2022 for grant of NOC for the land in Sy.No.296/4 to and extent of Ac.5.00 cents situated at Madhurawada Village, Visakhapatnam and to lA NO: 1 OF 2024 pass Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to amend the main prayer in the WP by adding the words after words 1st and 2nd Respondents is 'and the endorsement D.Dis.No.1012/2011/EI, dt.27-02-2016 issued by the 4th Respondent” 3 and further the words “India” add the words “to quash the endorsement D.Dis.No.1012/2011/El, dt.27-02-2016 issued by the 4th Respondent’ and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S); 1.A RAJENDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.13431 of 2023 ORDER: Pursuant to the letter addressed by Sri A. Rajendra Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners, to the Registry, this writ petition is listed today under the caption “for withdrawal”. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to 2. withdraw the present writ petition, stating that the petitioners wish to withdraw the case due to personal reasons. Accordingly, he has been instructed to withdraw the same. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ^fflceR //TRUE COPY// SECTION To, 1. One CC to Sri. A Rajendra Babu Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:07/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 13431 OF 2023 DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS