Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43797 (CHH)

SMT. NEETA SAHU v. BHIM SINGH

CONT/1475/2025 · 2025-09-21

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:48438 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1475 of 2025 1. Smt. Neeta Sahu W/o Shri Maheshwar Prasad Sahu, Aged About 37 Years Occupation - Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), R/o Village Bhathari, Tehsil Mungeli, Police Station Jarhagaon, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. Bhim Singh Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Siddharth Komal Pardesi, Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh And Director, Public Instruction, Directorate, First Floor, C-Block, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Chandra Kumar Dhritlahre, District Education Officer - Cum - Secretary, District Rationalisation Committee, Mungeli, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 4. Kundan Kumar, Collector, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Venketesh Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. S.P. Kale, Additional Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 22.09.2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present contempt petition under Article MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.09.23 18:44:30 +0530 2 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Court Act against non-compliance of the order dated 10.07.2025 (Annexure C/1) passed by this Court in WP(S) No. 7121/2025 by the respondents. 2. Learned State counsel alongwith Nodal Officer would submit that the order dated 10.07.2025 passed by this Court in WP(S) No. 7121/2025 has already been complied vide order dated 25.07.2025 by the respondents. 3. Since the order has already been complied, nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court at this juncture, however, liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the same before appropriate forum. Copy of the order dated 25.07.2025 is taken on record. 4. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish