Sonali Mane 22-WP-19163-2024.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 19163 OF 2024 Sanjay Chandrakant Chavan … Petitioner Versus Dhanalaxmi Nagari Sahakari Path Sanstha Ltd Karad and Ors … Respondents Mr. Nikhil N. Pawar for the Petitioner. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 6 JANUARY 2025. P.C. : 1) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. 2) It appears that so far, no steps are taken by the Recovery Officer for sale of the property in question. The learned counsel for the Petitioner would inform the Court that the delay in filing the Revision Application is already condoned and the Revision Application is slated for hearing on merits on 21 January 2024. Since the Revision Application itself can be decided on merits. I do not see any reason why order of status-quo needs to be restored. 3) The learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that all co-operation shall be extended to the Divisional Joint Registrar for expeditious decision of the Revision Application. Since the ___Page No. 1 of 2 ___ 6 January 2025 MANE SONALI DILIP Digitally signed by MANE SONALI DILIP Date: 2025.01.08 18:52:33 +0530 Sonali Mane 22-WP-19163-2024.docx Recovery Officer is not likely to sale the mortgage property before 21 January 2024, it is not necessary to restore the status-quo order. Instead, the Divisional Joint Registrar is requested to hear all parties on merits of the Revision Application on 21 January 2024 and to pronounce his decision on the Revision Application as expeditiously as possible and within a reasonable time after 21 January 2024. 4) With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] ___Page No. 2 of 2 ___ 6 January 2025