IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 18786 of 2025 Dinesh Kumar Pradhan ..…... Petitioner(s) Mr. Manoj Kumar Panda, Adv. -Versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ……..…. Opposite Party (s) Mr. Debasish Nayak, AGA CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI ORDER 18.07.2025 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard. 3. In filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the notice of eviction issued by the Tahasildar, Talcher/Opposite Party No.3 in Encroachment Case No.375 of 2023 vide Annexure-6. 4. Challenging the notice of eviction vide Annexure-6, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that pertaining to the selfsame dispute the Petitioner has already preferred an appeal vide Misc. Appeal No.3/2025 which is pending before the Sub-Collector, Talcher. He further contends that during pendency of the said appeal the present notice of eviction vide Annexure-6 has been issued to the Petitioner by the Tahasildar, Talcher which is per se Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 21-Jul-2025 19:18:05 Signature Not Verified 2 illegal. He, accordingly, prays for setting aside of the said notice of eviction vide Annexure-6. 5. Considering the above submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court directs that appeal at the instance of the Petitioner vide Misc. Appeal No.3/2025 shall be disposed of in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of presentation of an authenticated copy of this order. 6. It is further directed that till a decision on the above noted appeal at the instance of the Petitioner is taken, the impugned notice of eviction vide Annexure-6 shall not be given effect to. 7. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. ( Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge Murmu