1 2025:CGHC:48969 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 5073 of 2025 1 - Nilkumari Chouhan W/o Lt. Sukhdev Chouhan Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Charbhata, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Lalita Chouhan D/o Lt. Sukhdev Chouhan Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Charbhata, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Hemant Chouhan S/o Lt. Sukhdev Chouhan Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Charbhata, Tehsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Manbodhni Chouhan W/o Lt. Ratan Chouhan Aged About 62 Years R/o Odekera, Tahsil Dhabhara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Golak Kumar Patwari S/o Lt. Aghir Patwari Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Taraimar (Sahpur), Tahsil And P.S. Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Tahsildar Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Collector Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Ankit Singh, Advocate For State : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. GA VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.09.26 11:14:07 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 24/09/2025 1. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the State contended that the alternate remedy available to the petitioners under Section 50 of the Chhattisgargh Land Revenue Code, 1959, therefore, the petitioners may challenge the order passed by the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) before the Board of Revenue. 3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy as available to the petitioner under the Rule/law. 4. Prayer is allowed and the Petitioners are directed to file revision before the Revenue Board within ‘15 days’ from today and in turn, the Revenue Board shall decide such revision filed by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with rules, regulations and law. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant