Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4379 (UTT)

MOHD USMAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/515/2025 · 2025-03-27

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.515 of 2025 Mohd. Usman …..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.152 of 2021, dated 01.04.2021, under Sections 2/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station SIDCUL, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that out of two cases based on which, the applicant has been involved in the case, in one of the cases the applicant has been acquitted and in another case, he is on bail. 4. Learned State counsel admits these facts. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 2 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 27.03.2025 Sanjay