KRISHAN S/O RAJBAHADUR/GUDDI DEVI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1088/2025 · 2025-02-27
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4379 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4379 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:8768] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.1088/2025 Krishan S/o Rajbahadur/ Guddi Devi, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Badi Jatav Basti Kumheri, Police Station Saipau, District Dholpur, At Present R/o Op Sharma Colony, Near High-Way, Jewar, Police Station Jewar, District Gautam Bodh Nagar, Utter Pradesh. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sambharlek District Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 27/02/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.242/2024, registered at Police Station Phulera (Jaipur Rural), District Jaipur Rural, for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406 and 409 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 30.12.2024, charge-sheet has already been produced before the concerned Court, the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed.
[2025:RJ-JP:8768] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1088/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on the record.
5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 30.12.2024, the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Krishan S/o Rajbahadur/ Guddi Devi, in connection with FIR No.242/2024, registered at Police Station Phulera (Jaipur Rural), District Jaipur Rural, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-40