Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4379 (KAR)

MR ARJUN S/O BHAGAVANT PATIL v. THE BRANCH MANAGER

WP/101532/2025 · 2025-04-16

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6501 WP No. 101532 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101532 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. ARJUN S/O BHAGAVANT PATIL, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: CONTRACTOR, R/O: MAHAJAN COMPLEX, ATHANI, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591 304. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS B. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRASHANT F. GOUDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: THE BRANCH MANAGER, CANARA BANK, TILKWADI (558) BRANCH, P.B.NO.525, 197-D/2 KHANAPUR ROAD, TILAKWADI, BELAGAI (DPCD: 0558), BELAGAVI-590 06. … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B.HIREMATH., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP , THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6501 WP No. 101532 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Sri.Srinivas B.Naik., counsel on behalf of Sri.Prashant F.Goudar., for the petitioner has appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. When queried, counsel Sri.Srinivas B.Naik., submits that a conscious decision is taken by advocate on record and the petitioner about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 5. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 50