[2025:RJ-JP:49567] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18669/2025 Chitra Rekha Meena W/o Sh. Teekam Meena, Aged About 44 Years, R/o H. No.-2, Madhav Colony, Madar, District Ajmer Raj.- 305001. Employee Id- Rjda200613000802 Now Posted At Principal, Mahatma Gandhi Govt. School Naka, Madar Ajmer (221891), District Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur 302005. 2. Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan And Ex- Officio Additional State Project Director (Senior), Comprehensive Education Campaign (Smsa)-334001. 3. Deepti Pancholi, Now Posted In Place Of Appellant At Mahatma Gandhi Govt. School Naka, Madar Ajmer (221891), District Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gordhan Singh Fauzdar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Ms. Pooja Sharma and Mr. Vishal Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 05/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayer:- i) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the Impugned order 23.11.2025 (Annexure 1) and impugned order dated 24.11.2025 (Annexure 2), be quashed and set aside, qua petitioner. Consequently, the respondent be directed to allow the petitioner to continue to serve at present place of posting at Principal, Mahatma Gandhi Govt. [2025:RJ-JP:49567] (2 of 3) [CW-18669/2025] School Naka, Madar Ajmer (221891), District Ajmer with regular salary and consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 27.02.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No.332/2025 : Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the husband of the petitioner is posted in the District Ajmer and the present petitioner is transferred from Mahatma Gandhi Govt. School Naka, Madar Ajmer, District Ajmer to Govt. Senior Secondary School, Pal Nithauwa, Dungarpur. He also submits that it is duty of the respondents that the petitioner be transferred to the same place where her husband is working, who is also a Government servant. 3. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned AAG appearing on behalf of the respondents and he submits that due to administrative exigency the transfer has been effected but considering the grievance as raised by the petitioner, the petitioner is free to make a representation to the Department, which will consider the representation on the grounds raised by the petitioner and this petition can be disposed at this stage. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision [2025:RJ-JP:49567] (3 of 3) [CW-18669/2025] to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. In the meanwhile, impugned transfer order dated 23.11.2025 and relieving order dated 24.11.2025 qua the present petitioner shall remain stayed till disposal of the representation, by the respondents. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /409