Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43782 (AP)

Ravi Munlal Jaiswal v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLRC/1239/2025 · 2025-11-11

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[3521 ] IN THE HIGH COURT Of> ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX .PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO lA No. 1 OF 2026 IN CRLRC NO: 1239 OF 2025 Between: 1. Ravi Munlal Jaiswal, S/o. Munlal, aged about 38 years, R/o. Room No. 103 B Wing, Manali Road,Baraj Road, Badlapur Road, Kulgaon, Thane Maharashtra State. 2. Swapnanil Jaya Prakash Rane, S/o. Prakash Dinkar Rane, aged about 35 years R/o. Room No. 203, 2 Floor, Badlapur Road,Maharashtra State ...Petitioners/Accused No.1,2 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI BOOSARA V N PRAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Petition under Section 528 OF BNSS (482 OF Cr.P.C), is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order by Modifying the order in CrI.R.C. No. 1239/2025 dated 12.11.2025 to the extent of "The Petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2 shall be enlarged on bail subject to them executing bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) v;ith two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate of I Class at Paderu in the place of "The Petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2 shall be enlarged on bail subject to them executing bond for a sum of R^.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the I Addf. District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam" Pending disposal of CRLRC No. 1239 of 2025, on the file of the High Court. The court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made the following order.(The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case). ORDER Heard both sides. f I.A.No.1 of 2026 is allowed in part, modifying the order dated 12.11.2025 in CrI.R.C.No.1239 of 2025 to the extent of Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 and 2 shall be enlarged on bail subject to them executing bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of I Class at Paderu" instead of "the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall be enlarged on bail subject to them executing bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam". the SD/-SK MD RAFI DEPUTY REGISTRAR -•r (^ICER //TRUE COPY// SECTIOfJ To, 1. The I Additional District and Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam. \ 2. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Station House Officer, Munchingiput Police Station, Visakhapatnarh District. 4. One CC to SRI. BOOSARA V N PRAVEEN KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. One spare copy > ADP / -4 HIGH COURT DR.YLR.J DATED:08/01/2026 ORDER lA No. 1 OF 2026 IN CRLRC NO: 1239 OF 2025 1 9 JKN 2026 o KZ> mt \'A’ I.A.N0.1 OF 2026 IS ALLOWED IN PART