NITIN KUMAR TRIVEDI S/O SHRI MANGALAL TRIVEDI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18327/2025 · 2025-11-26
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43777 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43777 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47989] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18327/2025 Nitin Kumar Trivedi S/o Shri Mangalal Trivedi, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Shriji Mandir Ki Gali, Nagarwada, Banswara, Distt. Banswara (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 26/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed with costs and this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction; and May kindly be quash and set aside the order dated 20.03.2025 by which the benefit of 27 years MACP has been denied and further the respondents be directed to give the benefit of 27 years MACP in favour of the petitioner counting the length of service from the date of initial appointment with all consequential benefits and further the respondents be
directed to revise the pension / retiral benefits of the petitioner accordingly;
[2025:RJ-JP:47989] (2 of 2) [CW-18327/2025] Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper on the facts and in the circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of petitioner with cost of the petition.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /61