Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43774 (PNJ)

RAJNI BALA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/10182/2025 · 2025-04-08

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-10182-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 144 CWP-10182-2025 Date of Decision: 08.04.2025 Rajni Bala …Petitioner Versus The Principal Secretary, Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Karan Diwan, Advocate for Mr. Surinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to address her legal notice/representation dated 23.07.2024 (Annexure P-9). 2. The petitioner claims that she joined Punjab Police as Steno Typist on 20.01.1989. She was promoted to the rank of Senior Assistant on 19.09.2006 and transferred from Intelligence Wing to Litigation Wing. The respondent in 2022 has granted ACP to similarly situated employees. She has served legal notice dated 23.07.2024 (Annexure P-9) upon the respondent seeking ACP but to no avail. 3. Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab who on advance notice is present in Court on behalf of the respondent-State, assures the Court that competent authority would address petitioner’s legal notice within three months from today. MOHIT KUMAR 2025.04.08 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement. CWP-10182-2025 -2- 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees with the aforesaid arrangement. 5. In the wake of statement of both sides, the present petition stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 08.04.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.04.08 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement.