Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43769 (RAJ)

BADAN SINGH SHARMA S/O SHRI BALVIR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16718/2025 · 2025-11-24

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47670] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16718/2025 Badan Singh Sharma S/o Shri Balvir Singh, R/o 147, Halena, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur Through Power Of Attorney Bhim Singh Sharma S/o Balvir Singh, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Faujdar Basti, Halena, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Law Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. District Collector And District Magistrate, Bharatpur. 3. Superintending Of Police, Bharatpur. 4. Director, Ayurved Department, Rajasthan, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “i) by appropriate writ order or direction the Respondent No.1 to 3 may kindly be directed to send the information to the respondent no.4 and also petitioner within a period of one month regarding the appeal against the acquittal order dated 25.8.2006 passed by learned trial court in criminal case benefit of of No. 99/2005 State Rajasthan V/s Badan Singh & Anr. filed or not, so that retiral and pensionery benefit and other due petitioner be released to him. [2025:RJ-JP:47670] (2 of 2) [CW-16718/2025] ii) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be given in favour of the Petitioner. iii) Cost may also be awarded in favour of petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/165