Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43761 (CHH)

PRAVEEN KUMAR THAKUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10052/2019 · 2025-08-28

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:43906 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10052 of 2019 1 - Praveen Kumar Thakur S/o Shri K. N. Thakur Aged About 61 Years Presently Holding The Post Of Deputy Director Prosecution Posted At Raipur, Permanent R/o 27 / 34 Bandhwa Para, Purani Basti, Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Mandir Hasod, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Public Prosecution, Directorate, 3rd Block 4th Floor, Inrawati Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Mukund Kumar Deshpande, Joint Director, Office Of Deputy Director Prosecution District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 5 - R.S. Pandey, Joint Director, Office Of Deputy Director Prosecution District - Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Mangala Mishra, Joint Director, Office Of Deputy Director Prosecution District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Abhishek Thakur, Advocate RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.09.01 11:46:28 +0530 2 For State/Respondents No.1& 2 : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.3/CGPSC : Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 29/08/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submits that the sole petitioner has died, therefore, this petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the LRs of the petitioner to file afresh petition, if they wishes so. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have not opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with the liberty as sought for. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi