Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43761 (AP)

Mota Sai Kumar @Sai, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

CRLP/7391/2024 · 2025-04-07

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMAR TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N lA NOs. 1 AND 2 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7391 OF 2024 Between: 1. Mota Sai Kumar @Sai,, S/o. M Ramanaiah, Aged about 23 years, Occ Private Employee, R/o.Bheemreddy Colony, Gooty Road, Guntakal Rural, Anantapur District. Now Residing at near Chaitanya Junior College, Nizampeta, Hyderabad, Telangana State Aadhar No. 747914401775, Cell No. 6309140998 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh,, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravati. 2. Sake Navya,, W/o. Mota Sai Kumar, D/o. Siva Sankar, aged 19 Occ Housewife, R/o. 17-715, Neeruganti Street, Anantapur Town Anantapur District years. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 528 OF B.N.S.S praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to S.C No. 32 of 2022 on the file of Special Judge for Trial of POCSO Act Cases. Anantapuramu, Chittoor District and quash the same. ■A. NO: v| OF 2024 ■ • * Petition under Section 528 OF B.N.S.S praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, he High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to compound the offence U/s. 366-A, 376 of IPC and Sec. 5 R/w. 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 in S.C No. 32 of 2022 on the file of Special Judge for Trial of POCSO Act Cases, Anantapuramu, Chittoor District I.A. NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all proceedings in S.C No. 32 of 2023 on the file of Special Judge for Trial of POCSO Act Cases, Anantapuramu, Chittoor District I.A. NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record compromise and Quash the proceedings against the Accused in S.C No. 32 of 2023 on the file of Special Judge for Trial of POCSO Act Cases, Anantapuramu, Chittor District This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K Narsi Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri T.V. Jaggi Reddy Advocate for the Respondent No.2. on The Court made the following order: * > APHC010463512024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7391/2024 Between: Mota Sai Kumar @sai, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.KNARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2.TVJAGGI REDDY The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.7391 of 2024 COMMON ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 2"'^ respondent/defacto complainant submit that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and have filed IA.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024, accompanying the affidavit of the 2^^ respondent/defacto complainant and the joint memo, seeking the permission of this Court to allow the petitioners/accused and the defacto complainant to the case in Spl.SC.No.32 of 2022 on the file of Special Judge for Trial of POCSO Act Cases, Anthapuram. 2. The petitioner and the 2^^ respondent/defacto complainant are present in the Court. The parties were identified by their respective counsels. The identity cards of both the parties were verified. 3. The 2"'^ respondent submits that, pursuant to the intervention of well- wishers, she has been withdrawn the allegations made against the petitioner and she further submits that married the petitioner. She further confirmed that the compromise was reached voluntarily, without coercion or undue influence. 4. Recording the submissions of the 2"^^ respondent, lA Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 are allowed and the proceedings Spl.SC.No.32 of 2022 on the file of Special Judge for Trial of POCSO Act Cases, Anthapuram. 5. Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed. 3 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition shall stand closed. Sd/- U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR IT ^ ' SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Special Judge, for trail of POCSO Cases, Ananthapuramu. 2. One CC to SRI K Narsi Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. One CC to Sri T.V. Jaggi Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies PNM RAM w M HIGH COURT DATED:08/04/2025 ORDER I.A. Nos. 1 AND 2 OF 2024 IN CRLP.No.7391 of 2024 CRIMINAL PETITION ARE ALLOWED