[2025:RJ-JP:46963] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17890/2025 Jitendra Singh S/o Shivpal Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Mandela Chhota, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Sikar, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Sikar. 4. Prakash Chandra Chahhar, Presently Working On The Post Of Principal In Shaheed Hav. Ishwer Singh Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Bharunda Khurd, District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kalwaniya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar and Ms. Pooja Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG Mr. Aaditya Godara for Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 20/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by the petitioner with following prayer: “(i) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the impugned order dated 22.09.2025 and relieving order dated 24.09.2025 passed by the respondents and impugned order dated 28.10.2025 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Service Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur in appeal No.4458/2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside. [2025:RJ-JP:46963] (2 of 3) [CW-17890/2025] (ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents be directed to continue the petitioner on the post of Principal at Government Senior Secondary Scholl, Meeran, Sikar.” 2. Issue notice to respondents. 3. Mr. Vishal Kumar on behalf of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 4. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG as counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 14.12.2019 in SB CWP No.21353/2019 titled as Sundaram Kumawat Vs. Director, Secondary Education and Anr. submits that to accommodate respondent No.3, the petitioner has been transferred to a distant place more than 400 kms from his original place. 6. Learned counsel for respondents submits that petitioner may submit a representation and they will consider and decide the representation. 7. Having considered aforesaid and the fact that petitioner has moved before Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal and on 28.10.2025, while disposing the appeal No.4458/2025, the petitioner was directed to file a representation, therefore it is appropriate to direct the petitioner to submit a representation to the respondents. 8. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to [2025:RJ-JP:46963] (3 of 3) [CW-17890/2025] decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove and also grounds raised by petitioner, but in case of deviation, with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 9. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /31