HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 112/2025 Sanjay Singh @ Surendra Singh S/o Shri Kheem Singh Rawat, R/o Sadabhej Ka Badiya, Police Station Beawar, District Beawar (Raj.) (At Present Serving Sentence In District Jail Tonk) Through His Father- Kheem Singh Rawat S/o Shri Babu Singh, Aged About 50 Years R/o Sadabhej Ka Badiya, Police Station Beawar, District Beawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Inspector General, Prison, Jaipur. 2. The District Parole Advisory Committee, Through The District Magistrate, Beawar. 3. The Superintendent, District Jail Tonk (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Rawat. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Additional Government Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 04/03/2025 1. Accused-petitioner has filed this Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) seeking regular parole for a period of 40 days. 2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was released on parole on various occasions and after completion of parole period, the petitioner has surrendered before the jail authorities. It is further contended that parole application of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that the Superintendent of Police has given an adverse report against the (2 of 3) [CRLW-112/2025] petitioner. It is further contended that the petitioner has remained in custody for a period of more than ten years. His jail conduct as per the report of the Superintendent, District Jail is satisfactory and there was no justification in rejecting his parole application. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the writ petition. It is contended that Superintendent of Police has reported that the case in which the petitioner is undergoing sentence is of serious nature and if he is released on parole, it may affect the society as well as the complainant also. 4. In counter to the above, counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the report of the social welfare department is in favour of the petitioner and the jail conduct of the petitioner as reported by the Superintendent, District Jail is also satisfactory. 5. We have considered the contentions advanced by counsel for the parties and perused the material came on record. 6. Considering the fact that the petitioner has remained in custody for a period of more than ten years; thus as per the Rajasthan Prisoners on Parole Rules,1958, he is entitled for parole; his jail conduct is satisfactory; no documentary evidence in support of adverse police report has been placed on record to deny the prayer for grant of regular parole, hence in these facts and circumstances as well as the material before us, we deem it proper to allow the present writ petition (parole) and set aside the order/recommendations dated 21.10.2024. 7. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) is accordingly allowed. The order/recommendation of the Parole Advisory Committee dated 21.10.2024 qua the present petitioner is quashed. The Jail Authorities are directed to release the petitioner on regular parole (3 of 3) [CRLW-112/2025] for a period of 40 days on furnishing of his personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, District Jail, Tonk with the stipulation that he shall surrender himself before the Jail Authorities on the expiry of the parole period and shall maintain peace and tranquility during the parole period. 8. In case of his failure to surrender by stipulated date, the Jail Authorities shall proceed in accordance with law. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the Superintendent, District Jail, Tonk by fax today itself for necessary compliance. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J MG/33