Chandan Paswan @ Chandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./58536/2025 · 2026-02-25
Anshuman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4375 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4375 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58536 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2024 Thana- BAJPATTI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Chandan Paswan @ Chandan Kumar S/o- Charitra Paswan @ Chalitra Paswan Resident of Village- Muraul, P.S.- Bajpatti, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Dulari Devi W/o- Suresh Mukhiya Village- Muraul Ps- Bajpatti Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 6 25-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bajpatti P.S. Case No. 25 of 2024, lodged on 27.01.2024, under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 8 of the POCSO Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s bail application was earlier rejected vide order dated 01.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 68395 of 2024. He further submits that a report regarding the present stage of the trial was called for and from the report it transpires that out of seven witnesses, two witnesses have been examined and five
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58536 of 2025(6) dt.25-02-2026 2/2 witnesses are yet to be examined. He also submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.02.2024 and has a clean criminal antecedent.
4. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that charge was framed on 22.05.2025 and the examination of prosecution witnesses is going on. Out of seven witnesses, five witnesses are yet to be examined.
5. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
Aman Kumar/- (Dr. Anshuman, J.) U