Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43749 (AP)

SHAIK MAHAMMAD AMEER AHAMED v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/11157/2025 · 2025-04-29

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVJW (Special Original Jurisdiction) ^ WEDNESDAY .THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11157 OF 2025 >/-■ O e /» p. Between: Shaik Mahammad Ameer Ahamed, S/o. Abdul Gafar Saheb, aged about 57 years, R/o. D. No. 4/555, G.V. Satharam, Mydukur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District / ..Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagupudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, 1st floor, APIIC Towers, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Kadapa, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Badvel, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 5. The Tahsildar, Mydukur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 6. Thambatka Ashok Kumar, S/o. Not known to the Petitioner but Major, R/o. D. No. 1/137A, Mangali Street, Vanipenta Village, Mydukur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. At present working as Digital Assistant, Thotlapalle Village Secretariat, Brahamamgarimatam Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 7. Venkata Subbaiah, the then Village Revenue Officer, Nandyalampeta Village, Mydukur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District.At present working as Village Revenue Officer at Porumamila Tahsildar's Office, Porumamila Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. / (2) 7 8. Ms. Anuradha, the then Tahsildar, Mydukur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District.At present working as Tahsildar, Pendlimarri Mandal, Pendlimarri, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. ..Respondents " ‘Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, or a direction, or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 in taking action on the representation of the Petitioner dated 07.03.2025 and to link the Aadhar Card bearing No. 2552 5658 5103 of the Petitioner to his Khata No. 1250 relating to the lands of the Petitioner in Nandyalampeta Village Fields of Mydukur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutinal, and consequently to direct the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 to act immediately upon the representation of the Petitioner and to initiate action against the unofficial respondent Nos. 6, 7 and 8 and to link the Aadhar Card bearing No. 2552 5658 5103 of the Petitioner to his Khata No. 1250 relating to the lands of the Petitioner in Nandyalampeta Village Fields of Mydukur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 07.03.2025 and to link the Aadhar Card bearing No. 2552 5658 5103 of the Petitioner to his Khata No. 1250 relating to the lands of the Petitioner in Nandyalampeta Village Fields of Mydukur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. KALEEMULLA S Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: APHC010211972025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11157/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Shaik Mahammad Ameer Ahamed AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KALEEMULLAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE w Court made the following; ORD^: This Writ Petition is filed under Article seeking the following relief; The 226 of the Constitution of India ■to issue en order or a directlor. or a writ more P®"*' "rao"^ a ota 07 03.2025 and to iink the Aadhar Card bearing and oonseguently to direct the pTfLna' and <o Hdafa immediately upon the ^ “a g and fo link the eotion against the ^Pg^fsToS of (de Petitioner to his Khata Aadhar Card bearing “ Z petitioner in Nandyaiampeta Villlge%dds 0?Mydukur Mandal VSR Kadapa District and to pass such other order or orders... in respondent Petitioner and the learned counsel for the petitioner Heard the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. submits that the petitioner is the total extent of Fields, Mydukur Mandal, , to the petitioner’s unofficial respondent No.6 had learned counsel for the petitioner 3. The of land admeasuring to a absolute owner and possessor Ac.7.47 cents situated in Nandyaiampeta Village YSR Kadapa District, vide Khata No. 1250. However his knowledge that the . Khata No.1250 to his Aadhaar number without any made a surprise, it came to linked the petitioner’s from the petitioner. For which, the petitioner requesting for linking of authorization representation to the his Aadhaar 2nd respondent on 07.03.2025, number ot the lands related to his Khata No.1250. Even after receipt of the representation of the petitioner dated 07.03.2025, the respondent No.2 neither considered the representation nor issued any orders. Hence, the writ petition. 4. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents, submits that although the petitioner made a representation to the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent is in no way concerned with the issue. The grievance of the petitioner should be considered by respondent Nos. 4 and 5 herein. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, and upon perusal of the material available record, this Court is of the considered view that the present writ petition be disposed of by directing the 2nd respondent to forward the petitioner's representation dated 07.03.2025 to respondent Nos. 4 and 5, who are the concerned authorities for redressing the grievance of the petitioner. Upon receipt of the petitioner's representation, respondent Nos. 4 and 5 shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. on can 6. With the above direction the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANTREGiSTRAR (^SECTION //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department,State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagupudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.[By Special Messenger] 2. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, 1st floor, APIIC Towers, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Kadapa, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Badvel, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 5. The Tahsildar, Mydukur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 6. Thambatka Ashok Kumar, S/o. Not known to the Petitioner but Major, R/o. D. No. 1/137A, Mangali Street, Vanipenta Village, Mydukur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. At present working as Digital Assistant, Thotlapalle Village Secretariat, Brahamamgarimatam Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 7. Venkata Subbaiah, the then Village Revenue Officer, Nandyalampeta Village, Mydukur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District.At present working as Village Revenue Officer at Porumamila Tahsildar's Office, Porumamila Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 8. Ms. Anuradha, the then Tahsildar, Mydukur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District.At present working as Tahsildar, Pendlimarri Mandal, Pendlimarri, Y.S.R. Kadapa District.[2 to 8 by RPAD] 9. One CC to SRI. KALEEMULLA S Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. 10. [OUT] Three CD Copies 11. ■ri*» HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.11157of 2025 THE WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSED OF WITHOUT COSTS