Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43748 (RAJ)

PRITHVI SINGH S/O LATE SHRI AMAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13964/2025 · 2025-11-07

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44720] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13964/2025 Prithvi Singh S/o Late Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 73 Years, R/o Bilhedi, Police Station Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kishangarhbas). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Sanjay Yadav, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 07/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.115/2025 registered at Police Station Kotkasim, District Khairthal, Tijara for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(5) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that two FIRs were lodged for the same incident. It is submitted that the applicant is a senior citizen, aged approximately 73 years and has been in judicial custody ever since 13.10.2025. It is also submitted that there has been an inordinate delay of approximately three years in lodging the FIR (supra), inasmuch as the alleged embezzlement is stated to have occurred in the year 2021. It is also submitted that the FIR has been lodged by a former manager, whereas the applicant is the present Adhyaksh (President) of the institution. [2025:RJ-JP:44720] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13964/2025] 3. Per contra, Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, the fact that the applicant is a senior citizen; that the FIR was lodged after an inordinate delay of three years; that the trial will take a long time and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Prithvi Singh S/o Late Shri Amar Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /165