Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43735 (RAJ)

BHARAT SINGH S/O BAPULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12040/2025 · 2025-10-06

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40337] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12040/2025 1. Bharat Singh S/o Bapulal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kholkhedi Police Station Pagariya District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj) 2. Shambhu Singh S/o Balu Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Kholkhedi Police Station Pagariat District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/10/2025 1. The petitioners has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.88/2025 registered at Police Station Mishroli, District Jhalawar for offence under Sections 8, 22 of NDPS Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that during patrolling six grams of MDMA was recovered from the possession of the petitioners which is less than the commercial quantity. He argued that no criminal antecedents [2025:RJ-JP:40337] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12040/2025] exists against the petitioners. He again submits that the petitioners are behind the bars since 25.8.2025, the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody and the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Bharat Singh S/o Bapulal and Shambhu Singh S/o Balu Singh be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg /165