SMT. KIRAN GONAWAT v. RAMCHANDRA BAIRWA S/O LATE SHRI PANCHURAM BAIRWA
CMA/4999/2025 · 2025-11-25
Bipin Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43728 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43728 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47612] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4999/2025
1. Smt. Kiran Gonawat, Aged About 56 Years, W/o Late Shri Premprakash
2. Mohit Gonawat, Aged About 35 Years, S/o Late Shri Premprakash
3. Kashish Gonawat, Aged About 32 Years, S/o Late Shri Premprakash
4. Smt. Galkhu Devi W/o Late Shri Ramcharan Bairwa, Aged About 85 Years, All R/o Plot No. B-17, Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Appellants Versus
1. Ramchandra Bairwa S/o Late Shri Panchuram Bairwa, Aged About 90 Years, R/o C-88, Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur 302015 Rajasthan. 2. Smt. Mohari Devi W/o Shri Ramlal Lodiya, Aged About 80 Years, R/o Plot No. 650, Opposite Pani Ki Tanki, Barkat Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Smt. Bardi Devi, Aged About 90 Years, W/o Late Shri Ramnarayan
4. Hemraj Bairwa, Aged About 70 Years, S/o Late Shri Ramnarayan
5. Mahendra Gonawat S/o Late Shri Ramnarayan, Aged About 55 Years, R/o C-91, Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 6. Mukut Bihari S/o Late Shri Ramnarayan, Aged About 58 Years, R/o B-17 Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Smt. Maya Devi, Aged About 60 Years, W/o Late Shri Lalit Bairwa
8. Arun Bairwa, Aged About 39 Years, S/o Late Shri Lalit Bairwa
9. Abhishek Bairwa, Aged About 37 Years, S/o Late Shri Lalit Bairwa
10. Smt. Soniya Devi, Aged About 42 Years, W/o Shri Sunil And D/o Late Shri Lalit
11. Jyoti Devi W/o Shri Ramavtar And D/o Late Lalit, Aged About 36 Years, All R/o B-17 Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur,
[2025:RJ-JP:47612] (2 of 3) [CMA-4999/2025] Rajasthan. 12. Ghanshyam Bairwa, Aged About 45 Years, S/o Shri Ajay Kumar Bairwa And Late Smt. Kamla Devi
13. Suresh Bairwa, Aged About 42 Years, S/o Shri Ajay Kumar Bairwa And Late Smt. Kamla Devi,
14. Smt. Anita Devi, Aged About 38 Years, D/o Shri Ajay Kumar Bairwa And Late Smt. Kamla Devi
15. Smt. Pinki Devi D/o Shri Ajay Kumar Bairwa And Late Smt. Kamla Devi, Aged About 38 Years, All R/o B-36, Anandpuri, M.d. Road, Nayla House, Jaipur. Rajasthan. 16. Omwati D/o Late Shri Ramnarayan Bairwa W/o Shri Laxminarayan, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Plot No. 347, Gali No. 10, Barkat Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan. 17. Suresh Bairwa S/o Shri Ramchandra Bairwa, Aged About 65 Years, R/o B -17, Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 18.
Smt. Santosh Devi D/o Late Shri Ramcharan Bairwa W/o Shrinarayan Bairwa, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Plot No. A- 11, Agrasen Nagar, Near Mahesh Nagar Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 19. Smt. Sunita Devi D/o Late Shri Ramcharan Bairwa W/o Gopal Prasad Bairwa, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 68/46 Pratap Nagar, Sector-6, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 20. Smt. Anita Devi D/o Late Shri Ramcharan Bairwa W/o Rajendra Prasad, Aged About 57 Years, R/o 12/162, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 21. Gourav Bairwa, Aged About 31 Years, S/o Shri Vinod Bairwa
22. Smt. Aaksksha Devi, Aged About 28 Years, W/o Shri Devendra Bairwa
23. Kumari Varsha D/o Shri Vinod Bairwa, Aged About 25 Years, All R/o Plot No. 110, Shiv Shakti Nagar-A, Muhana Mandi, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajni Kant Tijara Mr. Vijendra Yadav Mr. Naresh Kumar Bairwa For Respondent(s) :
[2025:RJ-JP:47612] (3 of 3) [CMA-4999/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Order 25/11/2025
1. Without joining the issue on merits, learned counsel for the appellant submits that in his temporary injunction application pending, though he had been granted ad-interim order dated 06.11.2025 but no order has been passed to the effect of status quo in regard to disputed property. Therefore, he prays that the learned trial Court may be directed to decide the temporary injunction application at the earliest, without being influenced by the order dated 06.11.2025. 2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant, the present Civil Misc. Appeal stands disposed of with the direction that temporary injunction application, after service being completed, be decided, thereafter, within a period of 30 days. The learned trial Court shall not be influenced in any manner by the order dated 06.11.2025 and decide the temporary injunction based on its own merits. 3. All pending application(s), also stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/20