Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43722 (RAJ)

SMT. SAJJAN MITTAL WIFE OF LATE SHYAM SUNDER MITTAL v. MRS. LAD BAI

CW/15763/2025 · 2025-11-06

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44507] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15763/2025 Smt. Sajjan Mittal Wife Of Late Shyam Sunder Mittal, Resident Of Agrasen Bazar, Old Dhan Mandi, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Mrs. Lad Bai, Wife Of Late Devishankar 2. Brijesh Son Of Late Devishankar, All Resident Of 28/205, Kaithanipole Retwali, Kota Now Resident Of VHL 44, Vivekanand Nagar, Kota. 3. Shyam Sunder Mittal (Deceased), Through Legal Heirs 3/1. Smt. Sajjan Mittal Wife Of Late Shyam Sunder Mittal, (Previously On Record As Judgement Debtor No. 2) 3/2. Mohit Mittal Son Of Late Shyam Sunder Mittal 3/3. Meenu Mittal Daughter Of Late Shyam Sunder Mittal 3/4. Teenu Mittal Daughter Of Late Shyam Sunder Mittal 3/5. Priyanka Mittal Daughter Of Late Shyam Sunder Mittal 3/6. Suvanshu Mittal Daughter Of Late Shyam Sundar Mittal All Resident Of Agrasen Bazar, Old Dhan Mandi, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mayank Kumar Choudhary For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 06/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that in view of the provisions contained in Order 22 Rule 12 CPC, since the time limit prescribed under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC is not applicable to proceedings in execution of a decree or order; he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. [2025:RJ-JP:44507] (2 of 2) [CW-15763/2025] 2. Permission sought for is granted. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. The stay application as well as the other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/22