[2025:RJ-JP:51622] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19938/2025 Manoj Pareek Son Of Late Shri Puranmal Pareek, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 44-A, Deepak Colony, Sheopur, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur. 2. Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur. 3. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Vaishali Nagar Depot, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your lordship may graciously be pleased to admit and i) allow this Writ petition and- Issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to given 9 and 18 years service benefit to petitioner from date of its entitlement and pay the arrear along with 12% interest in the larger interest of justice. (ii) Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may kindly be passed in favour of petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:51622] (2 of 2) [CW-19938/2025] Iii) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioner. ” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 25.01.2017 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8810/2014 titled as “Tara Chand Vs. RSRTC & Anr. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of “Tara Chand Vs. RSRTC & Anr. (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /173