1 2025:CGHC:48244 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11021 of 2025 1 - Nakul Thakur S/o Shri Ram Singh Thakur Aged About 62 Years R/o Ganesh Chauk Ward No. 08, Begarpala, Post Office, Sikasar, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 2 - Shakar Lal Yadu S/o Mahangu Ram Yadu Aged About 74 Years R/o Ward No. 10 Indagaon, Post Office- Mainpur, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 3 - Chamar Ray Nishad S/o Punau Ray Nishad Aged About 63 Years R/o Ward No. 13 Purena, Fingeshwar District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 4 - Kailash Ram Baghel S/o Panch Baghel Aged About 62 Years R/o Bajar Chauk Pali, Fingeshwar District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 5 - Smt. Munnibai Pinjara W/o Sant Ram Pinjara Aged About 62 Years D/o Ramsingh Thakur, R/o Ward No. 11 Tulasi Nagar, Post Office- Malgaon, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resource Department, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Finance Department, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Engineer-In-Chief Water Resource Department, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Sector- 19, Capital Complex Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Executive Engineer Water Resource Department, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 6 - The Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) .. Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Kripesh G. Kela, Advocate. For State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. A.G. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 19/09 /2025 1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.09.22 10:41:39 +0530 2 Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022]. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun