i'" IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 In/and CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4356 OF 2025 Between: Alla Anjaneya Reddy @ Anji Reddy, S/o.Ananthayya, aged about 67 years, R/o. Thripuranthakam Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Through Yerraagonda Police Station, Prakasam. District. j*" 2. Malapati Sundara Babu, S/o. Late Ram Prasad, Aged about 38 years, Occ Private Employee, R/o Tripuranthakam Mandal, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in FIR. No.35 of 2025, dated 23.03.2025 on the file of Yerragonda Palem Police Station, Prakasam District, in so far as Petitioner is concerned. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2Q2fi Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C circumstances stated praying that in the in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Court, may Petition,the High Petitioner/Respondent to compound the offences be pleased to permit the and consequently quash all the proceedings In FIR.No. 35 of 2025 on the file of Yerragondapalem Police Station, Prakasam District against the petitioner in the interest of justice. I.A, NO: 3 OF 7n7fi Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the offences and consequently quash all the 2025 on the file YerragondaPalem Police same and compound the proceedings in FIR.No. 35 of Station, Prakasam District against the petitioner in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Papudippu Sashidar Reddy ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri G Mallikarjuna Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following Order: APHC010192472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] m WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4356/2025 Between: Alla Anjaneya Reddy @ Anji Reddy ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2.GAJJALA MALLIKARJUNA REDDY V l■A■Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION N0.4356 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short BNSS) has been filed by the petitioner/Accused No.1, seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in FIR No.35 of 2025 on the file of Yerragonda Palem Police Station, Prakasam District, for the offences under Sections 126(2), 109(1), 3(5) of the BNS and read with Sections 3(1 )(r), 3(1 )(s) of the SC and ST Act. 2. I.A.No.2 of 2025 is filed by respondent No.2, seeking to compound the offences between the parties. 3. I.A.No.3 of 2025 is filed by respondent No.2, seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR No.35 of 2025 on the file of Yerragonda Palem Police Station, Prakasam District, and a joint memo has been filed. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel representing for the unofficial respondent No.2, and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing respondent No. 1/State are present. Today, when the matter is taken up, petitioner /Accused No.1 and the 2'"'^ respondent herein were present before this Court. They 5. produced their respective Aadhar cards in proof of their identity. The nd learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 2 respondent have identified the parties in open Court. 6. Heard. There is no injury to substantiate the allegation under Section 7. 109; that apart, even as per the complaint and the pleadings on record, it is a private dispute between the petitioner and the 2^"^ respondent. Considering the same, FIR No.35 of 2025 on the file of 8. Yerragonda Palem Police Station, Prakasam District, is hereby quashed. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 and Criminal Petition 9. No.3250 of 2025 are allowed. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any. shall stand closed. Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The S.H.O., Yerragondapalem Police Station, Prakasam District. 2. One CC to Sri. Papudippu Sashidar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri P Sasidhar Reddy, Advocate.[OPUC] 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.[OUT] 5. Three CD Copies vna HIGH COURT DATED:23/04/2025 ORDER g It SEP 2025 % ^ Current Secuon ^ .z^- I.A.NO.S2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRLP.No.4356 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION