IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 111 JAVED KHAN AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a official respondents petitioner as well as his family members 96and to take action on 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has that the petitioner ha Senior Superintendent grievances as m considered and no action has this stage, the petitioner to respondent No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: JAVED KHAN AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Nipun Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty as well as his family members at the hands of respondent take action on their representation dated 02.04.2025 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has that the petitioner has recently filed a representation on Superintendent of Police, Sangrur (Annexure P mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.3442 of 2025 Date of decision: 07.04.2025 …. Petitioners Versus …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty and property of the at the hands of respondents No. 4 to their representation dated 02.04.2025 (Annexure P-1). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted recently filed a representation on 02.04.2025 before the Sangrur (Annexure P-1) raising their petition but the same has not yet been been taken thereon. He further submitted that at satisfied if appropriate directions are issued of Police, Sangrur to decide the of the the of the 4 to submitted before the their petition but the same has not yet been further submitted that at satisfied if appropriate directions are issued decide the Jyoti 2025.04.07 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.3442 of 2025 aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take thereon. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to her 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of one month from with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the family members security in order to protect their life and liberty 07.04.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.3442 of 2025 aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 02.04.2025 (Annexure P one month from today, by passing a spea with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the family members, the official respondents would provide security in order to protect their life and liberty. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.3442 of 2025 -2- aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab, who is present in Court, has respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-1) of the petitioner within a today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioner as well as his , the official respondents would provide them adequate . (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No necessary action who is present in Court, has the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance as well as his them adequate Jyoti 2025.04.07 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document