[2025:RJ-JP:47416] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14563/2025 Sonu Saini S/o Shri Bhagwan Saini, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Khudiyana, Police Station Kathumar, District Alwar (Rajasthan) Presently Residing At Near Shiv Mandir, Pandit Ka Bas Bakhtal, Police Station M.i.a., District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.741/2021 registered at Police Station NEB, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 8/21, 22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that present is a matter of bail jump and earlier also, applicant was bailed out. It is submitted that the applicant is a young boy, aged approximately 19 years who is behind the bars from last five months. It is submitted that the applicant is ready to abide all the conditions, if imposed and will always attend the Court proceedings. [2025:RJ-JP:47416] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14563/2025] 3. It is further submitted that it is an admitted fact that the applicant has on an erstwhile occasion jumped the bail conditions, by not marking presence before the learned Trial Court however, in this regard, for consideration of the present matter, ratios opined in SBCRLMB No. 2371/2020 titled as Kuldeep Singh Vs. State of Raj. and SBCRLMB No. 8977/2022 titled as Husain Khan & Anr. Vs. State of Raj., ought to be considered. It is assured that the applicant shall not make an attempt to jump the bail again. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted that the applicant has one criminal antecedent and his past conduct raises serious apprehensions and there is likelihood of him absconding, if released on bail. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering the age of the applicant and looking his custody period; that earlier occasion also, he was enlarged on bail; that it is assured that the applicant shall now onward regularly appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every date of hearing, as fixed and directed by the Court concerned, and not jump the bail again; that the applicant is willing and ready to abide with the conditions so imposed, and taking note of the overall facts and circumstances, and relying upon the ratio encapsulated in SBCRLMB No. 2371/2020 (Supra) and SBCRLMB No. 8977/2022 (Supra), taking reformative approach, but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. Howsoever, it is [2025:RJ-JP:47416] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14563/2025] directed that it be ensured that the applicant shall not jump the bail again. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Sonu Saini S/o Shri Bhagwan Saini shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- additionally deposit a cost of Rs. 5,000/- in favour of Rajasthan Police Benevolent Fund; and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. However, it is made clear that in future, if any of the conditions imposed, are not abided, the instant bail grant shall be cancelled. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /129