321 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2560-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.08.2025 Hari Singh ... Petitioner(s) Versus Som Krishan and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 18.11.2023 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division)-cum-Rent Controller, Bathinda whereby an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC was dismissed. 2. As per the E-Courts Official Website of the District Courts, Bathinda, during the interregnum, the main petition being RP-40-2019 stands allowed on merits vide order dated 23.07.2025 and hence the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 21.08.2025 Ankur ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO ANKUR GOYAL 2025.08.22 08:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment