DILIP KUMAR ARORA S/O SHRI LEKHRAJ ARORA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17362/2025 · 2025-12-04
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43696 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43696 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49360] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17362/2025 Dilip Kumar Arora S/o Shri Lekhraj Arora, Aged About 62 Years, R/ 904-C, Shrinath Puram, Sector-C, Engineering College, Kota ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Director General, Harishchandra Mathur, Rajasthan State Institute Of Public Administration, Opp. Old Rto Office, Dcm Road, Chhatrapura, Ramchandrapura, Kota
3. Additional Director, Harishchandra Mathur, Rajasthan State Institute Of Public Administration, Opp. Old Rto Office, Dcm Road, Chhatrapura, Ramchandrapura, Kota ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 04/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“By appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof the impugned order dated 17.09.2025 issued by respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside. By appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be
directed to allow continue to the petitioner to work on the post of Junior Assistant in Respondent Institute til completion of tenure or availability of regularly selected candidate
[2025:RJ-JP:49360] (2 of 2) [CW-17362/2025] attaining the age of 65 years with all consequential benefits.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /352