Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43696 (AP)

KADIMISETTY GANDALU REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/1677/2025 · 2025-01-26

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUA'RY^^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE " O O 73 WJ). PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 1677 OF 2025 Between: Kadimlsetty Gandalu Reddy, S/o. Nagi Reddy, Aged 37 years, R/o. HG- 622, Nagulapalli Village U Kothapalli, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Department, Velagapudi Mandal, Guntur District. 2. The Superintended of Police, East Godavari District Home Kakinada. ...Respondents of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue in the nature of writ of respondents in Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution may an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly mandamus, declaring the action of one the passing order of removal in C.NO.6324/H1/2017, dated 06.07.2017 D.0.17/2017 in removing me from the services and m not considering my representations to continue my services from time to time and ultimately in 03.03.2024 and not taking any decision thereon unjust and to not deciding my latest representation dated as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider my representations to continue my services as the home guard rescinding the earlier removal orders stated above. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an interim direction against the 1st respondent to consider my representation dated 03.03.2024 to reinstate me my services, by continuing my services as a home guard during the pregnancy of this writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. TAMADA RAMJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following order: APHC010019762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY .THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 1677/2025 Between: 1.KADIMISETTY GANDALU REDDY, S/0. NAGI REDDY, AGED 37 YEARS, R/0. HG-622, NAGULAPALLI VILLAGE U KOTHAPALLI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTENDED OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in passing order of removal in D.0.17/2017 in C.NO.6324/H1/2017, dated 06.07.2017 removing me from the services and in not considering my representations to continue my services from time to time and ultimately in not deciding my latest representation dated 03.03.2024 and not taking any decision thereon as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and to consequently direct the respondents to consider my representations to continue my services as the \ / \ 2 home guard rescinding the earlier removal orders such stated above and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pass an interim direction against the 1st respondent to consider representation dated 03.03.2024 to reinstate me my services, by continuing my services as a home guard during the pregnancy of this writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.TAMADA RAMJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Tamada Ramji Varma, learned counsel for the permission to withdraw the present writ petition. my petitioner seeks 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT gistrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Tamada Ramji Varma Advocate [OPUCJ 2. Two CCs to GP for Services I, 3. Three CD Copies High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] GSC t HIGH COURT DATED: 27/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.1677 of 2025 ? 0 7 MAY 2025 ^ . Current Section to, a DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS