[2025:RJ-JP:49634] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18856/2025 Ajay Prakash Singh S/o Late Shri Ramji Singh, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of 32, Parshavnath Nagar, Borkheda, District Kota. (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Mines And Geology, Govt.of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Director, Department Of Mines And Geology, Udaipur. (Raj) 3. The Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Pathak For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 05/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore humble prayed that the Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allowed the writ petition and grant the relied prayed for as under: - 1. That by issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof and thereby direct the respondents to grant annual grade increment to the petitioner from the date of its entitlement i.e. from 2024 to 2025. ii. That by an appropriate wit, order or direction the respondents may [2025:RJ-JP:49634] (2 of 3) [CW-18856/2025] kindly be directed to grant the arrears along with other consequential benefits. iii. The any other appropriate order or direction which is deemed just and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be issued in favour of the humble petitioner. iv. That the writ petition may kindly be allowed throughout with cost..” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 05.05.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8780/2025 titled as Rahul Dagur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be considered for disposal in light of Rahul Dagur (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents [2025:RJ-JP:49634] (3 of 3) [CW-18856/2025] are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /132