IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37000 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-623 Year-2019 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ====================================================== Md. Shazad @ Md. Shahzaad @ Sonu Son of Md. Hashim @ Md. Hasim R/O Mohalla- Sagar pokhra, Purbighat, Ward no. 34, P.S.- Bettiah Town, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Tahira Khatoon @ Priyanka Kumari Wife of Md. Shazad @ Sonu, D/O Rajan Bailha R/O Vill./Mohalla- Sagar pokhara, Porbighat, P.s.- Bettiah Town, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Adya Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 5 04-02-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 623 of 2019 for the offence registered under Sections 498A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act lodged on 21.08.2019 by the informant, Tahira Khatoon @ Priyanka Kumari. 3. In order no. 4, there is a typographical mistake in paragraph-6 and the same be read as follows: “6. As jointly prayed for, list this case on 31.01.2025.” 4. Both the parties have jointly submitted that pursuant to the agreement, the petitioner is making payment to the lady. 5. Time has now come to consigned the file. 6. It will always be open to the lady to take Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37000 of 2024(5) dt.04-02-2025 2/2 appropriate legal steps if the petitioner backtracks from fulfilling the agreement he has made which has come on record on 04.10.2024. 7. The provisional bail granted vide order no. 4, dated 04.10.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 37000 of 2024 stands confirmed with following conditions: (i) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (ii) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; (iii) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T