201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- RSA-473-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.05.2025 Davinder Singh Gill ......Appellant Vs. Haryana State Electricity Board ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate and Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate for the respondent. SUDEEPTI SHARMA.J. (ORAL) 1. The present appeal pertains to the year 2001. On 29.04.2025, no one had put in appearance on behalf of the appellant and the Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant. 2. As per report of the Registry, appellant remained unserved as no such person was found at the given address. 3. Today, Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant and contends that he has no instructions in the matter. 4. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. TRIPTI SAINI 2025.05.15 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-473-2001 (O&M) -2- 6. Liberty is reserved to the appellant to move an application for restoration of the appeal as and when any cause of action survives. 7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. May 14, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes / No TRIPTI SAINI 2025.05.15 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document