HIDAYATULLAH BANDAY AND ANOTHER v. MOHD IQBAL BANDAY AND OTHERS
CM(M)/231/2025 · 2025-08-18
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4369 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4369 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CM(M) No. 231/2025 CM No. 5073/2025
Hidayatullah Banday and anr.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Anshu Mahajan, Advocate.
vs
Mohd Iqbal Banday and ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 18.08.2025
1. After arguing for a while, when the learned counsel for the petitioners was confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, he submits that he wants to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to approach the learned trial court, where the matter is pending adjudication.
2. His statement is taken on record.
3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition along with the connected application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 18.08.2025 Sahil Padha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No.
Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No. Serial No. 9 Sahil Padha 2025.08.18 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document