Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:11104
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP(227) No. 756 of 2022 • Bimala Bai D/o Late Mannudas Aged About 55 Years W/o Netu, Occupation-Labour, R/o Village Ghotvani, P.H. No. 4, Tahsil -Saja District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. (Plaintiff)
... Petitioner Versus
1. Keertandas S/o Ramdas Aged About 26 Years Occupation Kashtkar R/o Village Ghotvani, Tahsil - Saja, Distrct Bemetara Chhattisgarh
2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Bemetara Chhattisgarh. (Defendants)
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Bharat Rajput, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 For Respondent No. 2/State : : Mr. Amitabh Shara, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Sudhir Kumar Verma, Advocate Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Panel Laywer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 06/03/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-
“10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the order dated 12.10.2022 passed by the appellate court below and further may kindly be allow the application for grant of temporary injunction of the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the cost of the petition may be given.” Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI
2
2. At the very outset, Mr. Bharat Rajput, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous.
3. No objection from other side.
4. Recording the statement made by Mr. Bharat Rajput, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti